One of the most valuable qualities of a researcher stems from their own worldview. How the researcher sees the world leads to the papers they right, the research they conduct, and the theories they hope to test. How they see the world makes their views and observations totally unique. No two people will have the exact same worldview and that leads to a diverse and constantly changing academic world. Observation is a wonderful tool, but difficult to use because of how unique every worldview is.
Observation is almost impossible to separate from your own personal biases. This is actually not a large problem, as there are easy ways to circumvent this. Since everyone has to face the same problems of bias in observation it is expected. Let me provide an example of differences in observation:
A young boy is given three options for a snack. He is given an apple, a marshmallow, and a bag of chips. The boy looks at the bag of chips and holds them in his hand before picking up the marshmallow and looking at it with obvious desire in his eyes. He seems hesitant and looks around before sighing and putting it down. The boy then picks up the apple and, with less desire in his eyes, chooses the apple for his snack. He later asks if he could have the marshmallow as well.
Depending on your own personal experiences, what you observe, and the reasons behind the boys actions, will be different than another researcher. One researcher might decide that the boy chose the apple because his parents always taught him that he must finish healthy food before he could have a treat. Another researcher might observe a boy who feels like he might get in trouble if he chooses the sugary snack, so he chooses the healthy one and hopes he can have the sugary snack later. A third researcher might see a child who knows that an apple is more filling as a snack and, even though the marshmallow is more of a treat, chooses the apple because he is more famished. He still tries to get the marshmallow after he is filled up, though.
Again, all these different observations occur because each researcher has had a different life experience and worldview. A researcher that grew up under parents who made them eat healthy food before a dessert would see one thing while a researcher who had very “hands-off” parents might see it differently.
Bias is unavoidable, but as academic researchers, we must do our best to address it and make it known. There are some biases that you will never be able to remove, but if you address it yourself, you are acknowledging it and therefore it can’t be used as an argument to discredit your paper.
So how do you try to remove bias from your own observations? The easiest way is to have multiple researchers observe the same occurrence and compare their observations. This is a simple way to remove some bias and hone in on the facts. Think of this method like a Venn Diagram. You all observe a participant and use your research to find the common factors that everyone saw. Another way is simply taking a step back and attempting to look at at things from a different perspective. This is handy outside of just research (looking at you ex-girlfriends). Doing this won’t come through specifically in your research, but will allow you to readjust your mind set before you decide your official observation.
Research is difficult and bias makes things even more difficult to present your research in a manner that will stand up to academic scrutiny and analysis.